docs: align reference pages and experiments with the runtime - #154
Open
imran-siddique wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
docs: align reference pages and experiments with the runtime#154imran-siddique wants to merge 1 commit into
imran-siddique wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Imran Siddique <imran.siddique@opaque.co>
Member
Author
|
@agentrust-io/maintainers please review and approve this documentation follow-up. It corrects the call sequence and trust boundaries, and makes the documented experiments runnable. All CI checks are green; local validation passed 567 tests with 6 skips. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The deeper cA2A references still described Cedar, sealed transport, and TRACE binding as unimplemented. The inbound flow also put sealing on the callee and described authorization records as proof of completed work. This updates 14 pages to the implemented checks, distinguishes caller and callee appraisal, and explains the limits of unsigned provenance.
Three documented experiments failed before reaching their intended checks because they omitted trusted roots. They now retain their generated authority separately and pass it explicitly. The tutorials run in sequence, distinguish signature tampering from correctly signed scope escalation, and demonstrate a fully rewritten unsigned path that still passes consistency checks. CI executes all six experiment entry points and the exact tutorial blocks.
Validation: 567 unit/conformance tests passed, 6 skipped (90.11% coverage); Ruff lint/format and mypy passed. MkDocs build passed with the existing missing-SPONSORS navigation warning addressed by #153. Browser checked the architecture reference at desktop and 390px width. No new hardware run was performed; C6 uses synthetic evidence.
This supplements #153 without changing its landing-page/quickstart files. Maintainer review requested before merge.